Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
AGI Is Infeasible. Instead, Pursue Superhuman Adaptable Intelligence
  Originally published in Forbes On a recent episode of the...
Artifact-Driven Development: Making It Possible to Query Large Analytics and AI Projects
 A practical introduction to making complex project structure explicit...
Incoherent AGI Hype Spurs An Industrywide Pivot To Hybrid AI
  Originally published in Forbes Recently on The Dr. Data Show,...
The AI Paradox: More Humanlike Means Less Autonomous
  Originally published in Forbes The AI executives are at...
SHARE THIS:

10 years ago
Are Random Variables a Fact of Life in Predictive Models?

 In some of the more recent literature, discussion has ensued about the use of pure random or noise variables that end up as key variables in predictive models. In our big data environment with millions of records and thousands of variables, intuitively one might think that random or spurious variables might be a normal outcome in many models. As a data miner, I am always intrigued by fellow colleagues who arrive at certain findings based on their research and work. When considering the validity of these comments, I remember my own experiences in building hundreds of models over

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in on the right (desktop) or below (mobile). If not, register today and gain free access to original content and industry news. See the details here.

Comments are closed.