Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
AGI Is Infeasible. Instead, Pursue Superhuman Adaptable Intelligence
  Originally published in Forbes On a recent episode of the...
Artifact-Driven Development: Making It Possible to Query Large Analytics and AI Projects
 A practical introduction to making complex project structure explicit...
Incoherent AGI Hype Spurs An Industrywide Pivot To Hybrid AI
  Originally published in Forbes Recently on The Dr. Data Show,...
The AI Paradox: More Humanlike Means Less Autonomous
  Originally published in Forbes The AI executives are at...
SHARE THIS:

9 years ago
Feature Engineering vs. Machine Learning in Optimizing Customer Behavior

 The debate on this topic is not a new one. What is the secret sauce in yielding improved modelling performance?  Is it the inputs, features or variables of a given predictive model or is it the specific mathematics that is used alongside these inputs or features? Historically, practitioners including myself, have tended to argue that it is the inputs or the feature engineering component which yield the most value when building models. In fact, I wrote a paper several years ago which was published in the “Journal of Marketing Analytics” –May, 2013 entitled “Is predictive analytics for marketers

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in on the right (desktop) or below (mobile). If not, register today and gain free access to original content and industry news. See the details here.

Comments are closed.