Machine Learning Times
Machine Learning Times
Elon Musk Predicts Artificial General Intelligence In 2 Years. Here’s Why That’s Hype
 Originally published in Forbes, April 10, 2024 When OpenAI’s...
Survey: Machine Learning Projects Still Routinely Fail to Deploy
 Originally published in KDnuggets. Eric Siegel highlights the chronic...
Three Best Practices for Unilever’s Global Analytics Initiatives
    This article from Morgan Vawter, Global Vice...
Getting Machine Learning Projects from Idea to Execution
 Originally published in Harvard Business Review Machine learning might...

1 year ago
CNET Found Errors in More Than Half Of Its AI-Written Stories

Originally published in The Verge, Jan 25, 2023. 

The tech news site came under scrutiny this month after it was reported the outlet was using AI to write articles. Last week, executives said the use of the AI tool would be paused ‘for now.’

CNET issued corrections on 41 of the 77 stories the outlet published that were written using an AI tool. In a note published todayCNET editor-in-chief Connie Guglielmo defended the use of the AI writing tool but said that an internal review of stories uncovered numerous errors in the articles at the center of the controversy.

Articles with corrections include ones titled “What Is Compound Interest?,” “How Much Should You Keep in a CD?,” “Does a Home Equity Loan Affect Private Mortgage Insurance?” and dozens more. A handful of articles, like this one, had the correction note reading, “We’ve replaced phrases that were not entirely original,” indicating that some of their language may have been plagiarized.

Earlier this month, Futurism broke the news that CNET had been quietly publishing articles written by AI for months without drawing much public attention or making a formal announcement. In a follow-up story, the outlet noted numerous errors in a CNET article about compound interest, which eventually resulted in a lengthy correction. Following the errors, a disclaimer appeared at the top of all AI-written stories: “We are currently reviewing this story for accuracy. If we find errors, we will update and issue corrections.”

To continue reading this article, click here.

8 thoughts on “CNET Found Errors in More Than Half Of Its AI-Written Stories

  1. I love reading through a post that will make people think. Also, thanks a lot for allowing me to comment here! If you want to know about fnaf. Maybe this game will be useful to you after stressful working hours. Let’s experience this fun with me.

  2. I discovered the issue through your pen to be intriguing! Like myself, I think a lot of other people are curious about them. How long does it take to write an article like this? I hope you’ll keep writing high-caliber articles to share with everyone. I think many people will be shocked when they read this article! I appreciate your post. cookie clicker

  3. It’s usually not an easy task to identify stories written by AI. I use AI in my daily life because it’s very convenient. For example when I ask it to find  1 dollar deposit  it gives me a very good selection of websites where I can deposit me money. So I don’t need to do it myself

  4. CNET, a prominent tech news site, recently faced scrutiny for utilizing AI to produce articles. While defending the use of the AI tool, CNET’s editor-in-chief, Connie Guglielmo, acknowledged errors in 41 out of 77 AI-generated stories, prompting corrections. Topics ranged from “What Is Compound Interest?” to insights on home equity loans. Some corrections indicated the replacement of non-original phrases, raising concerns about potential plagiarism. The incident underscores the challenges and scrutiny associated with AI-generated content in journalism. For more insights into online platforms and technologies, explore options like 1 dollar deposit resources.


Leave a Reply