Machine Learning Times
Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
MLW Preview Video: Dean Abbott, President at Abbott Analytics
 In anticipation of his upcoming pre-conference workshop and presentations...
MLW Preview Video: Evan Wimpey, Director of Strategic Analytics at Elder Research
 In anticipation of his upcoming presentation at Predictive Analytics...
Wise Practitioner – Machine Learning Week Interview: Mack Wallace, Head of Financial Products at MPOWER Financing
 In anticipation of his upcoming presentation at Predictive Analytics...
Wise Practitioner – Machine Learning Week Interview: Alejandro Jesús Castañeira Rodriguez, Principal Data Scientist at JANZZ Ltd.
 In anticipation of his upcoming presentation at Predictive Analytics...
SHARE THIS:

12 months ago
Artificial Intelligence Is Breaking Patent Law

 
Originally published in Nature, May 24, 2022.

The patent system assumes that inventors are human. Inventions devised by machines require their own intellectual property law and an international treaty.

In 2020, a machine-learning algorithm helped researchers to develop a potent antibiotic that works against many pathogens (see Nature https://doi.org/ggm2p4; 2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) is also being used to aid vaccine development, drug design, materials discovery, space technology and ship design. Within a few years, numerous inventions could involve AI. This is creating one of the biggest threats patent systems have faced.

Patent law is based on the assumption that inventors are human; it currently struggles to deal with an inventor that is a machine. Courts around the world are wrestling with this problem now as patent applications naming an AI system as the inventor have been lodged in more than 100 countries1. Several groups are conducting public consultations on AI and intellectual property (IP) law, including in the United States, United Kingdom and Europe.

If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge. Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions.

Rather than forcing old patent laws to accommodate new technology, we propose that national governments design bespoke IP law — AI-IP — that protects AI-generated inventions. Nations should also create an international treaty to ensure that these laws follow standardized principles, and that any disputes can be resolved efficiently. Researchers need to inform both steps.

To continue reading this article, click here.

One thought on “Artificial Intelligence Is Breaking Patent Law

Leave a Reply