Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Hybrid AI Emerges To Tame LLMs – And Not A Moment Too Soon
 Originally published in Forbes The great potential of LLMs is...
AGI Is Infeasible. Instead, Pursue Superhuman Adaptable Intelligence
  Originally published in Forbes On a recent episode of the...
Artifact-Driven Development: Making It Possible to Query Large Analytics and AI Projects
 A practical introduction to making complex project structure explicit...
Incoherent AGI Hype Spurs An Industrywide Pivot To Hybrid AI
  Originally published in Forbes Recently on The Dr. Data Show,...
SHARE THIS:

1 hour ago
Up the Stack: How AI’s Escape From the Commodity Trap Risks Enterprise Lock-in

 

Originally published on AI as Normal Technology, July 10, 2026.

Critics and boosters are both looking in the wrong place

Our goal in this essay is to move beyond the debate over whether AI is a bubble. We do so in two ways: clearly separating current financials from the question of who captures value in the long run, and recognizing that the labs are not confined to be model providers. They can migrate up the stack and are already aggressively doing so. This will likely allow them to escape the commodity trap but raises new concerns — customer lock-in and reduced competition.

Akash Kapur is a visiting fellow at Princeton and a senior fellow at New America. He is no relation to Sayash Kapoor.


As leading AI companies continue to invest massively in capacity and race toward blockbuster IPOs, serious questions linger about their business models. How will these companies — along with the vast ecosystem of chipmakers, hyperscalers, and infrastructure partners that depends on them — recoup the estimated $4–8 trillion projected to be invested in AI infrastructure by the early 2030s?

The current conversation splits between critics and boosters. Critics point to mounting losses, the gap between capex and revenue, and reports about the leading labs’ massive cash burn. Boosters cite accelerating rapid revenue growth, enterprise adoption, and milestones like Anthropic’s first profitable quarter. Each camp has a valid point. But both are looking in the wrong place — the same quarterly statements, the same short-term view of an industry that remains in flux.

In recent months, we have been thinking about the nature and sustainability of the AI business, and we’ve landed in a different place than most of the existing commentary. AI companies today earn much of their revenue by charging for inference, but the conditions of frontier inference make this an unusually difficult business to maintain. Models are largely undifferentiated, the leading labs operate with similar capital structures, switching costs are low, and prices can be adjusted freely. All of this appears to set up the conditions for a commodity trap that would pose real challenges to the task of building high-margin or even profitable businesses.

To continue reading this article, click here.

Comments are closed.