Machine Learning Times
Machine Learning Times
FAQ for Eric Siegel’s New Book, “The AI Playbook”
  There are plenty of questions to answer about...
Announcing Eric Siegel’s New Book: The AI Playbook
  Dear Reader, I’m excited to announce the forthcoming,...
Predictive Analytics for the Call Center
 So, you just received your shiny new smart watch....
MLW Preview Video: Gulrez Khan, Data Science Lead at PayPal
 In anticipation of his upcoming keynote presentation at Predictive...

By: Dr. John Elder, CEO and Founder, Elder Research, Inc

 (Part 2 of 11 of the Top 10 Data Mining Mistakes, drawn largely from Chapter 20 of the Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications) Only out-of-sample results matter; otherwise, a lookup table would always be the best model.  Researchers at the MD Anderson medical center in Houston (almost two decades ago) used neural networks to detect cancer.  Their out-of-sample results were reasonably good, though worse than training, which is typical.  They supposed that longer training of the network would improve it – after all, that’s the way it works with doctors – and were astonished to

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in on the right (desktop) or below (mobile). If not, register today and gain free access to original content and industry news. See the details here.

Comments are closed.