Machine Learning Times
Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Panic Over DeepSeek Exposes AI’s Weak Foundation On Hype
 Originally published in Forbes The story about DeepSeek has disrupted...
AI Drives Alphabet’s Moonshot To Save The World’s Electrical Grid
 Originally published in Forbes Note: Ravi Jain, Chief Technology Officer...
Why Alphabet’s Clean Energy Moonshot Depends On AI
 Originally published in Forbes Note: Ravi Jain, Chief Technology Officer...
Predictive AI Only Works If Stakeholders Tune This Dial
 Originally published in Forbes I’ll break it to you gently:...
SHARE THIS:

By: Dr. John Elder, CEO and Founder, Elder Research, Inc

 (Part 2 of 11 of the Top 10 Data Mining Mistakes, drawn largely from Chapter 20 of the Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications) Only out-of-sample results matter; otherwise, a lookup table would always be the best model.  Researchers at the MD Anderson medical center in Houston (almost two decades ago) used neural networks to detect cancer.  Their out-of-sample results were reasonably good, though worse than training, which is typical.  They supposed that longer training of the network would improve it – after all, that’s the way it works with doctors – and were astonished to

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in on the right (desktop) or below (mobile). If not, register today and gain free access to original content and industry news. See the details here.

Comments are closed.