Machine Learning Times
Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Three Best Practices for Unilever’s Global Analytics Initiatives
    This article from Morgan Vawter, Global Vice...
Getting Machine Learning Projects from Idea to Execution
 Originally published in Harvard Business Review Machine learning might...
Eric Siegel on Bloomberg Businessweek
  Listen to Eric Siegel, former Columbia University Professor,...
Effective Machine Learning Needs Leadership — Not AI Hype
 Originally published in BigThink, Feb 12, 2024.  Excerpted from The...
SHARE THIS:

8 years ago
Eugenics Journey to the Dark Side at the Dawn of Statistics

 

April 27th was the anniversary of the death of Karl Pearson, who contributed to statistics the correlation coefficient, principal components, the (increasingly-maligned) p-value, and much more.

Pearson was one of a trio of founding fathers of modern statistics, the others being Francis Galton and Ronald A. Fisher. Galton, Pearson and Fischer were deeply involved with eugenics, a social philosophy that advocated suppression of reproduction among the “unfit” and encouragement of reproduction among the “fit.”

Francis Galton (correlation, regression to the mean, survey methods) coined the term “eugenics” after reading “The Origin of Species” by his half cousin, Charles Darwin.

Galton focused much of his research and scientific publications on eugenics, and became the Honorary President of the British Eugenics Society. Karl Pearson was a protege of Galton who assumed the Galton Chair of Eugenics at the University of London.

It was Pearson who saw society as “an organized whole, kept up to a high pitch of internal efficiency by insuring that its numbers are substantially recruited from the better stocks, and kept up to a high pitch of external efficiency by contest, chiefly by way of war with inferior races.”

R.A. Fisher (design of experiments, discriminant analysis, F-distribution) joined official committees to promote eugenics and, in his “Genetical Theory of Natural Selection,” focused on eugenics and what he saw as the need for the upper classes to boost their fertility.

The close ties between eugenics and statistics dissolved as statistics branched out in the service of all scientific disciplines, and eugenics itself was discredited through its close association with Nazi Germany.

The statistical methods that were developed in the service of eugenics are all sound and have survived the test of time. Though they are but a long-faded shadow in the eyes of modern statisticians, the genetic theories and social policies that motivated the founding fathers of statistics are, like Jefferson’s views on slavery and Churchill’s on Indian independence, a jarring reminder that illumination and truth often come bundled with a measure of darkness.

Author Bio:

Peter Bruce is founder of The Institute for Statistics Education at Statistics.com, the leading online provider of analytics and statistics courses since 2002. He also is the author of the newly-released Introductory Statistics and Analytics: A Resampling Perspective. (Wiley)

Article previously published on KDnuggets.

Leave a Reply