Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Our Last Hope Before The AI Bubble Detonates: Taming LLMs
  Originally published in Forbes To know that we’re in...
The Agentic AI Hype Cycle Is Out Of Control — Yet Widely Normalized
  Originally published in Forbes I recently wrote about how...
Predictive AI Must Be Valuated – But Rarely Is. Here’s How To Do It
  Originally published in Forbes To be a business is...
Agentic AI Is The New Vaporware
  Originally published in Forbes The hype term “agentic AI”...
SHARE THIS:

11 years ago
Using Statistics and Visualization as Complementary Validation

 I don’t often find myself thinking or saying common maxims (e.g. Better to be safe than sorry). But there is an uncommon maxim I learned from Jeffrey Luftig, who taught one of my favorite statistics courses. He had a number of colorful sayings but the one that has stuck with me in my professional life is Never show a statistic without a picture; never show a picture without a statistic. I think about this often while validating analytical work. Anscombe’s quartet has become a well-known example of where statistics alone can be misleading. All four data sets below

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in on the right (desktop) or below (mobile). If not, register today and gain free access to original content and industry news. See the details here.

Comments are closed.