Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Hybrid AI: Industry Event Signals Emerging Hot Trend
 Originally published in Forbes After decades chairing and keynoting myriad...
Predictive AI Thrives, Despite GenAI Stealing The Spotlight
 Originally published in Forbes Generative AI and predictive AI ought...
For Managing Business Uncertainty, Predictive AI Eclipses GenAI
  Originally published in Forbes The future is the ultimate...
AI Business Value Is Not an Oxymoron: How Predictive AI Delivers Real ROI for Enterprises
  Originally published in AI Realized Now “Shouldn’t a great...
SHARE THIS:
  • Jun 1, 2024
  • Comments Off on GPT-4 didn’t ace the bar exam after all, MIT research suggests — it didn’t even break the 70th percentile
  • Industry News, Left-hand
  • 4302 Views

2 years ago
GPT-4 didn’t ace the bar exam after all, MIT research suggests — it didn’t even break the 70th percentile

 

Originally published in Live Science, May 31, 2024.

Last year, claims that OpenAI’s GPT-4 model beat 90% of trainee lawyers on the bar exam generated a flurry of media hype. But these claims were likely overstated, a new study suggests.

GPT-4 didn’t actually score in the top 10% on the bar exam after all, new research suggests.

OpenAI, the company behind the large language model (LLM) that powers its chatbot ChatGPT, made the claim in March last year, and the announcement sent shock waves around the web and the legal profession.

Now, a new study has revealed that the much-hyped 90th-percentile figure was actually skewed toward repeat test-takers who had already failed the exam one or more times — a much lower-scoring group than those who generally take the test. The researcher published his findings March 30 in the journal Artificial Intelligence and Law.

To continue reading this article, click here.

Comments are closed.